I wrote a novel years ago which was partly about a future
people who have no symbolic or verbal language. They only communicate
telepathically by transmitting images and emotions. Language of the past is
seen by these future people as synonymous with violence and deception and
because of this, merely uttering sounds from the mouth is seen as shameful.
Speaking is now taboo and this prohibition is rigidly enforced by the elders of
the village.
I was reminded of this when stumbling upon several reports, in
mainstream media, of official, supposedly scientific studies which said that
not only singing can spread the virus, so can talking. For example:
and:
Moving on from the fact the above article was published in the ‘I’ newspaper in the U.K. on September 11th, and the fact it pushes the boundaries even in these insane times for how far we are supposed to believe the pronouncements of scientists, the article states that actually raising your decibels in speech increases the transmission of the virus. It tells us that ‘droplets too small for the eye to see are ejected while speaking. They evaporate to leave behind particles big enough to carry viable virus’. This puts the thought out (and the planting of thoughts is itself an invisible transmission that infects people’s minds) that by speaking to someone, you can be killing them, or killing someone else in the future. This reminds me of both Tony Burgess’ novel Pontypool Changes Everything, where zombies are created through a breakdown in language, and Ben Marcus’ novel The Flame Alphabet where a deadly disease is transmitted through speech, specifically by children. In The Flame Alphabet, the adult authorities have children rounded up and taken to internment camps. In unrelated news the British Army, in their role ‘helping’ people to test and self-isolate in Liverpool (first city in a nationwide operation) have been carrying out testing of children in schools. At least one school told parents their children would be barcoded and those who test positive ‘secured’:
‘Secured’?
Where and how? Imagine being a parent receiving that letter (the school in
question were forced to backtrack). Far worse, imagine being one of the
children faced with the army coming to their school, administering tests on
them, and telling them they are infectious and need to be isolated from their
friends and family…
In
further unrelated news, there have been articles about camps in Canada where people
with COVID can be housed, away from the general population. Michael Ryan, a high-level
WHO official, publicly stated that most infections were now happening in homes
and authorities therefore needed ‘to go and look in families to find those
people who may be sick, and remove them and isolate them in a safe and
dignified manner.’ So, asking for children to be removed from their families,
or for parents to be removed from their children, if someone is thought to be
with COVID. Even though children, even in official, sanctioned studies, are at
almost zero risk of serious illness. The infamous Bill 6666 introduced in the
American Congress in May this year gives $100 billion funding for the testing
and tracing of people who may have ‘the’ virus, through mobile units which can
go to community ‘hot-spots’ and test and ‘quarantine’ people ‘at their
residences’. The Bill is short and vague, which is in keeping with emergency
legislation ushered through in this country (U.K.) without any meaningful
questioning by our politicians.
And this brings us to another side of the importance of language: reading and listening to what is said, and speaking out to question it. This is being denied, restricted or silenced. The mainstream media overwhelmingly pumps out propaganda to support the official narrative and will only mention counter arguments disparagingly, in ways which frame it as nonsense and dangerous to be considered. The big internet search engines and social media platforms have carried out a purge of those voices which are deemed undesirable. Even videos and written articles by qualified doctors, other medical professionals and scientists have been removed from the internet for daring to question the imposed narrative, no matter the accuracy of the data they provide, no matter the research they have done and the expert analysis and opinion they contain. There have even been those who have lost their job or been arrested, such as the German Dr Heiko Schoning at the Hyde Park protest, and the Swiss cardiologist Dr Thomas Binder MD (as he discusses on the Richie Allen Show on 4 November https://player.fm/series/the-richie-allen-show-2428800/the-richie-allen-show-wednesday-november-4th-2020 )
The oft quoted right
to free speech has been dismantled and, perhaps most disturbingly of all,
people and institutions that call themselves liberal are the quickest and
loudest to shout THEIR message that
censorship is GOOD. Censorship is important because to be allowed to
question is dangerous. Many of these people have the temerity to accuse those
campaigning AGAINST the destruction of civil rights as fascist. Our world is so
clearly conforming to the blueprint written by Orwell over 70 years ago –
‘Doublethink’ and ‘newspeak’ are all tools utilised daily.
Language has been dumbed down, reduced to soundbites, memes,
twitter posts and slogans. Repetition of the mind-control propaganda of our
time burrows phrases into our minds so everyone spews them out as if they
always have, ‘lockdown’ (previously confined to prisons), ‘stay safe’, ‘protect
the NHS’, ‘clap for carers’, ‘stay home’ till we are all bound with the new
normal.
Words have power, they can manipulate, they can take over
minds, they can control. And they can kill. And so can the denial of words, if
people stay silent when they should speak out. Language is at the centre of
this agenda as it is to all human society. Through words, the propaganda
machine manipulates and controls. An analogy of what is happening this year would
be a crowded hall with many people where one person shouts ‘Fire!’ Whether through
malice, or error, or perhaps they have seen a very small flame. But the word is
heard by others who panic, not seeing the fire but fearing it anyway they start
to run and shout ‘fire’ as well, so people start to scream as the panic spreads
and there is a stampede for the exits. Some people, the weakest, stumble, are
pushed, and fall to the floor while others trample over them to try and save
themselves. And the weak and unfortunate die because of fear, from a word, not
from smoke or fire.
We have been told for months that the people around us, our
friends, even our own families, are to be avoided and kept at a distance. We
are forced to wear masks, in some countries even in the open air, so speech is
often muffled and facial expressions are obscured. The most basic human
interaction is rendered criminal; we are told we are endangering the ones we
love if we embrace them. And the people pushing this are doing it because when
you are physically close to someone you can confer meaning and emotion which is
not always possible in the same way remotely, in a Zoom meeting or FaceTime
call. Barriers are broken and a word can be whispered in the ear which the
authorities can’t hear.
The prohibition against singing contributes to the
destruction of culture which the lockdown measures have caused. But to actually
begin to suggest that speech itself, the way we communicate, can lead to death,
can be infectious like a killer virus, is starting a process which…it couldn’t
surely could it?... leads to a world like my novel, where actual speech is
considered dangerous and vile.
If we consider the
word ‘virus’, this had already taken on a new meaning through computer software
– again with Gates central, as head of Microsoft – as a stream of code, of
data, that erodes text, erodes the strata of programs which hold together a
creation, from which a virtual construction is built. And now we have the
present constructed virus – with its web of words and symbols eroding the foundation
of our existing view of reality. The propaganda and censorship obliterating
words which are deemed wrong, the Fahrenheit
451 book-burning of the digital age. Gates is now driving the vaccine
agenda, his foundation investing billions to buy the influence of medical officials,
governments and media. The new experimental vaccines for the ‘virus’ are, for
the first time I understand, RNA. So, they are introducing synthetic messenger RNA molecules into cells. The
mainstream is determined to dissuade so-called conspiracy theory that this is
re-writing human DNA. But, at a molecular level, the vaccine is changing the
way a body’s cells communicate and supposedly causing the cells to react in a
specified way. As, in the macrocosm, us individual people are given new instructions
to make us react and interact in a predetermined way. And it isn’t as if the re-writing
of DNA is something which is only in the realms of science fiction or ‘conspiracy
theory’:
The current stage in the imposition of the new order is now being rolled out in the guise of the ‘Great Reset’ which is in no way whatsoever to be confused with the New World Order. The ‘pandemic’ has conveniently opened the opportunity for this new world…, sorry, Great Reset but the supposed architect of it, Klaus Schwab, wrote his book Shaping the Future of The Fourth Industrial Revolution two years ago or more. In this book, as noted on the Zerohedge.com website, Schwab openly discusses and actually advocates a transhumanism which is supposedly the province of crazy conspiracy theorists.
“Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at
becoming part of the physical world around us—they will become part of us,”
writes Schwab. “Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have
become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices—from wearable
computers to virtual reality headsets—will almost certainly become implantable
in our bodies and brains.”
Schwab is enthusiastic about “active implantable microchips
that break the skin barrier of our bodies.” He asserts that such “implanted
devices will likely also help to communicate thoughts normally expressed
verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts
or moods by reading brain waves and other signals.”
Worrying as all this is, it also made me think of my novel
that I mentioned at the beginning of this article. Schwab and other technocrats
want unspoken ‘thoughts or moods’ transmitted via technology implanted within
the human body. My imagined future was more about a telepathic, almost
spiritual connection between people. Sadly, the elites governing our future
want ultimate control of our minds. They already have most people’s anyway, now
the means to do it is becoming more blatant, and intrinsically implanted within
the human. So we are being moved to a situation where eventually people will
only communicate through technology, through images, codes and data. The
individual voice is being lost.
